NationBuilding

ThoughtStorms Wiki

Thought : I wonder if anyone is trying a PatternLanguageForNationBuilding? (Maybe that's a bit crass?)

** http://www.prospect.org/web/printfriendly-view.ww?id=7604

Economist article : http://www.economist.com/world/africa/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3715904

InstitutionBuilding is better : http://zenpundit.blogspot.com/2006/05/building-institutions-vs.html

Nation building or Gene-splicing : http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=060106D

Interesting, Hayekian analysis which admits to NegativeSpontaneousOrder. But I think he shows a certain misunderstanding in this paragraph :

Whatever we think about nation building, we should all be able to agree that both positive and negative spontaneous orders can and do emerge. A key question becomes: from what do they emerge? Institutions, where institutions are, roughly speaking, the internal rule-sets by which a country operates. And there are good institutions and bad institutions.

(My emphasis.) If he truly believes in spontaneous order or "emergent" properties then he has to accept that, by definition, the macroscopic is not simply reducable to, or predictable from, the microscopic.

Emergent outcomes are the result of the rule-set up and running in a complex environment. Once you accept that, nothing is straightforward or self-evident. Sometimes bad spontaneous order will come from apparently innocuous rule-sets.

Sometimes apparently bad rules can ameliorate negative consequences and allow for healthier spontaneous orders to emerge.

BillSeitz:SocietyDesign

See also :

Bookmarked at 2021-08-25T20:12:47.235333 https://www.noemamag.com/the-end-of-nation-building/