LawyersAreEvilBastards
ThoughtStorms Wiki
Context : IntellectualProperty
Quora Answer : Is it sampling if you recreate a synth sound and use it in another track, for example, Saturday sandstorm lead on a different melody?
It's not technically "sampling" if you aren't using a recording of the original sound.
It's not "copying" if you aren't using a recording or a copy of the parameters.
If you are using your ears and recreating something on a synth you have that sounds like a synth someone else has, that is not sampling.
HOWEVER ... lawyers are evil bastards[1] ... and that doesn't mean that someone won't try to make the case that if your synth sounds very like a well known and popular synth, that you aren't "copying" in some other sense.
Evil lawyers have recently managed to convince courts that very short fragments of melody or even a riff with a particular vibe ARE copyrightable and that someone reproducing them is violating the copyright.
Now I think that's totally wrong. Pretty much every musician and musicologist thinks that this is totally wrong.
BUT ...
lawyers are evil bastards[1] and they ultimately shape the law. So you can't rule out that they wouldn't try to sue you for reproducing the Sandstorm synth riff, or couldn't bamboozle a stupid jury into accepting it.
[1] Note that perhaps lawyers are not evil bastards in their personal lives, but a good heuristic is to assume that in matters of copyright they are. ( IANAL and this is not legal advice. )
No Backlinks